top of page
Four pillars of integrity...Character, Virtue, Excellence, and Expectation

Today, we are hearing a lot about AI technology and a wide range of abuses and corrupt practices that threaten individual and collective security in America and globally. Thank goodness Senators Ted Cruz and Raphael Warnock introduced legislation in July 2026 to directly address the issues of AI and moral failure. The Cruz'-Warnock legislation, the Human Dignity and Emerging Technologies Act, aims directly at creating Federal oversight over developing technologies like AI through a Commission on Human Dignity. Both Cruz's and Warnock's statements on this legislation capture the essence of this bill's objective with the following:


Emerging technologies have the potential to improve everyday life and strengthen America’s position on the global stage. But as these technologies continue to evolve, we should carefully consider the ethical questions they raise and ensure human dignity remains at the center of our policymaking. The Human Dignity and Emerging Technologies Act will help ensure that as we lead the world in technological advancement, we remain guided by the values that define our nation.


As artificial intelligence continues to become a larger part of our society, we need to be clear eyed about addressing the potential problems and perils of this technology. That is why I am joining Senator Cruz in addressing AI’s implications for human dignity. Our bipartisan advisory committee will be important to informing both Congress and the American people on the best path forward for AI. 


Both Cruz and Warnock are to be applauded for their patriotic motivations to restore dignity, integrity, and moral virtue to the American public. Their comments and legislation in particular echo the Founding Fathers' moral convictions about freedom and America's foundation. I directly addressed this in my March 2025 blog titled America Needs a Freedom Refresh Now. I referenced David Gowdy's excellent article, Without Virtue There Can Be No LIberty, which highlights the Founding Fathers' uncompromising commitment to character, integrity, and moral virtue. Gowdy makes this perfectly clear when he states the following...


Virtue ennobles individual character and lifts society as a whole. Virtuous principles eschew prejudice and discrimination, confirming that “all men are created equal.” Virtue encompasses characteristics of goodwill, patience, tolerance, kindness, respect, humility, gratitude, courage, honor, industry, honesty, chastity and fidelity. These precepts serve as the cornerstones for both individual happiness and societal governance.


According to Cruz and Warnock, the AI Industry must be grounded in character and moral virtue so that the dignity of American citizens, individually and collectively, can be protected by a commission that promotes and enforces moral standards for the common good.


This legislative masterpiece underscores the critical need for ethical frameworks in the development and deployment of artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies that have the potential for manipulation, disinformation, deception, and corruption at the public's expense. As AI systems become increasingly integrated into various aspects of daily life, from healthcare to finance and beyond, the potential impact of these technologies on society is becoming more and more problematic and harmful.


The call for a commission dedicated to upholding moral standards is particularly pertinent in an era where rapid technological advancements outpace the establishment of regulatory expectations. Such a commission would not only serve as a governing body to oversee AI development but also as a guiding force that ensures these innovations align with the fundamental values of respect, fairness, human dignity, and justice. By embedding character and virtue into the core of AI initiatives, we can create systems that prioritize human dignity and promote equitable outcomes for all individuals. Furthermore, the establishment of this commission could involve a diverse group of stakeholders, including ethicists, technologists, community leaders, and representatives from various demographic backgrounds. This inclusivity would ensure that the moral standards being promoted are reflective of a broad spectrum of perspectives and experiences, thereby enhancing the legitimacy and effectiveness of the commission's efforts. Additionally, as AI continues to evolve, the commission would be tasked with the ongoing assessment of emerging technologies, providing guidance on ethical dilemmas that may arise, and adapting standards as necessary to address new challenges. This proactive approach would help mitigate potential risks associated with AI, such as bias in algorithms, invasion of privacy, and the potential for job displacement, thereby safeguarding the interests of American citizens.


To make all of this work effectively, we need to properly define and promote the fundamental importance of integrity and character personally and professionally. I stumbled upon a very enlightening article that gives a thorough understanding of what integrity means and its importance to society. How to Be a Man of Integrity by Bob Bunn does an excellent job of providing foundational knowledge of integrity, its origins, and how it is to be properly understood and applied in our lives daily. The following quotes highlight Bunn's analysis through the Christian Worldview lens that can make a tremendous difference culturally, especially when it comes to issues like the misuse of Artificial Intelligence as a threat to society.


  • Integrity Is About Wholeness: A man who is not whole in his character will eventually buckle under the pressures of daily life.

  • Integrity Is Built in Community: No man develops consistent character in isolation; it grows through accountable relationships with men who will call him higher.


The English word “integrity” comes from the Latin word “integer,” which means to be whole or intact. That is the same word math students use for numbers that are not fractions or mixed numerals. They are not divided. They are complete.


The word shows up in construction too. Engineers talk about the integrity of a structure, meaning its stability and safety.


A structure lacking integrity is dangerous, even deadly. The same is true for a man. If we are not whole as individuals, we lose our moral compass. And if we are not building our lives on a solid foundation, we will collapse under the weight of daily life.


Why does God want us to have integrity?

God wants men to have integrity because it reflects His own character, builds trust in relationships, and creates a stable foundation for the families and communities He calls us to lead.


In conclusion, Cruz and Warnock's vision for an AI Industry rooted in character and moral virtue is not just a noble ideal but a necessary foundation for ensuring that technological progress serves the common good. By advocating for a commission that actively promotes and enforces these moral standards, we can work towards a future where AI enhances the human experience while upholding the dignity and rights of every individual in accordance with God's vision for humanity and society that the Founding Fathers advocated for and as Bob Bunn accurately and meaningfully articulates in his wonderful article, How to Be a Man of Integrity.



 
 
 


In my March 2025 blog titled America Needs a Freedom Refresh Now, I highlighted the Founders' fundamental principles they promoted to ensure a safe and thriving American Republic. They grounded everything from the Constitution, to good governance, to cultural integrity on character, virtue, and the exercise of religious faith by individuals in the public square. Joseph Loconte's brilliant article, Faith and Freedom:  The Missing Link, which I referenced in my March 2025 blog mentioned above, captures this important fundamental thought of the founders in the following:


Behind the religious clamor, however, lie a remarkably enlightened view of church and state: the assumption that religion was essential to democratic government...


The reason goes back to the Founders' view of democracy. Freedom depends on citizens who can govern themselves, which means freedom requires virtue. But it takes more than laws to sustain morality. It requires religion - not the enfeebled variety of an established church, but the muscular faith of individual believers and congregations exercised in the public square. This was, more or less, the view held by virtually all the Founders, even the most irreligious among them.


This was, more or less, the view held by virtually all the Founders, even the most irreligious among them.


The Trump Task Force seized on this core belief in their investigation of the Biden Administration's handling of faith and Christianity publicly and within the federal government. The published report, well over 200 pages, provides highly detailed examples of the Biden Administration's assault on Christians. Each example is incredibly disturbing and leaves a damaging black eye on the Biden Presidency and it's impact on democracy and religious freedom in the American Republic. Here's a chilling example of one of the numerous transgressions revealed in the report.


Key Finding 12: The Biden Administration denied Christians and faith-based organizations

equal access to government services, benefits, and programs. In some instances, this refusal

was based on the applicant simply being Christian. In others, it was based on the applicants’

Christian views. The Biden Administration undertook a multi-agency rulemaking that broadly

burdened faith-based organizations’ access to federal funds and public programs. Under the Biden Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) and Small Business Administration (SBA) limited Christians’ access to federal economic relief, disaster assistance, security grants, and food programs.


This example, viewed within the context of David Loconte's quote above, should alarm every U.S. citizen because not only was the Christian faith targeted and harassed by Biden's government, but the nexus between faith, morality, and cultural integrity as embraced by the Founders, was viciously ignored and as a result has created major moral repercussions with American cultural values, community stability, leadership ineptness, and the role and presence of the Christian faith in the American ethos that was meant to ground the American Republic as envisioned and promoted by the Founders definitively.


The Biden bias compromised America's moral and religious ideals such that we are experiencing moral and religious decay like never before. That said, we can be verry thankful for the 2026 Report by the Trump Task force, Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias within the Federal Government April 30, 2026, which will begin the restoration of the American Republic as the model for religious freedom, Christian virtues as core values for good governance, cultural stability and integrity, and a return to the Founders vision of America as the exemplar for the preservation of the Christian faith as a public square virtue and for public integrity as an objective standard that reinforces the National Interest without compromise for good governance and community stability. To that end, I shall conclude with the following quote that from one of our greatest founders whose timeless words serve as a reminder and renewal of the values, ideals, and principles that have anchored America's greatness throughout history.


“It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage. Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governor of the Universe.” – James Madison,


ben views. The Biden Administration undertook a multi-agency rulemaking that broadly


burdened faith-based organizations’ access to federal funds and public programs. Under the Biden


Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) and Small Business


Administration (SBA) limited Christians’ access to federal economic relief, disaster assistance,


security grants, and food programs.

Key Finding 12: The Biden Administration denied Christians and faith-based organizations


equal access to government services, benefits, and programs. In some instances, this refusal


was based on the applicant simply being Christian. In others, it was based on the applicants’


Christian views. The Biden Administration undertook a multi-agency rulemaking that broadly


burdened faith-based organizations’ access to federal funds and public programs. Under the Biden


Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) and Small Business


Administration (SBA) limited Christians’ access to federal economic relief, disaster assistance,


security grants, and food programs.



 
 
 

Since Kamala's entrance into the 2024 presidential race, she has frequently referenced the importance of "freedom" in her attempt to elevate herself as the self-proclaimed freedom fighter. From the title, you already know that I profoundly disagree with Kamala's false bravado when it comes to the way she flirts with and flaunts her version of "freedom". Nevertheless, there's no denying that her campaign platform centers around freedom and civil liberties, and she believes that she is the answer to restoring freedom to the masses.


In the release of Kamala's initial campaign ad, Beyonce's Grammy nominated song Freedom was featured and became the official song for her 2024 presidential campaign. The ad itself reads as follows:


"I'm Kamala Harris, and I'm running for President of the United States. In this election, we each face a question: What kind of country do we want to live in? There are some people who think we should be a country of chaos, of fear, of hate. But us, we choose something different. We choose freedom."


Ok, I get it...the song, the campaign theme: the connection is obvious in that two high-profile women are celebrating America's foremost value that has influenced American history from the Revolutionary War, to slavery and the Civil War, to today. Freedom in America has been a battleground for centuries with countless lives lost only to result in the triumphant restoration of human dignity and the fulfillment of our premier guiding documents, the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, and the U.S. Constitution. In the immortal words of the late, great Martin Luther King Jr., Let Freedom Ring, and yes indeed, American freedom is truly the prize and envy of the world.


Interestingly, however, when you listen to Freedom by Beyonce, which again is Kamala's official presidential campaign song, the following lyrics are ironic and jaw-dropping, I'MA RIOT, I'MA RIOT, THROUGH YOUR BORDERS. In today's vernacular, we call this Foot in Mouth Disease and rightly so due to our current catastrophic situation at our southern border, especially given Kamala's status as the presiding "Border Czar". That said, do these lyrics serve as code for Kamala by signifying "freedom" for illegal immigrants crossing over to the U.S.? After all, she is on record for being a staunch advocate for the decriminalization of illegal immigration(1). Similarly, do these lyrics become marching orders for illegal border crossers, and if so, is she responsible for any rioting or violence that occurs hereafter along the U.S.-Mexico border? Time will tell as we watch and wait with these lyrics ringing loudly in our ears like a bad case of tinnitus.


In all seriousness, with all the celebratory freedom talk by "team Kamala", I find her approach flippant, misguided, and egregious. The freedom flaws are evident to the naked eye and detrimental to a proper and historically accurate understanding as formulated and treasured by America's founding fathers.


Joseph Loconte's timeless article Faith and Freedom: The Missing Link, written in 2000, exposes Kamala's flawed handling of the essence of America's founding and greatness. In the follow-up to his unpacking of the importance of faith and political liberty to a post-Revolutionary War America, Loconte brilliantly makes the following deduction:


The reason goes back to the Founders' view of democracy. Freedom depends on citizens who can govern themselves, which means freedom requires virtue. But it takes more than laws to sustain morality. It requires religion - not the enfeebled variety of an established church, but the muscular faith of individual believers and congregations exercised in the public square.


John Witherspoon, one of America's most inspiring and influential founding fathers, also a signatory to the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, gives historical context and meaning to Loconte's claim in this pithy but remarkable quote, "God grant in America true religion and civil liberty may be inseparable and the unjust attempts to destroy the one, may in the issue tend to the support and establishment of both." This from a man who carried the tiles of statesman, minister, and president of the College of New Jersey, which later became Princeton University. He was so honored and respected that John Adams once said that John Witherspoon was "as high a son of liberty as any man in America." (2)


Lastly, David J. Gowdy's excellent article reinforces what I have expressed thus far, but he goes one step further. Gowdy provides a historical backdrop that captures the prevailing faith-freedom sentiment of the early colonist.


John Adams stated it this way, “Public virtue cannot exist in a Nation without private Virtueand public Virtue is the only Foundation of Republics.” In this regard, the revolutionary war was as much a battle against “the corruption of 18th century British high society,” as it was against financial oppression.  While the Founders and American colonists were very concerned with their civil liberty and economic freedom, demanding “no taxation without representation,” they were equally concerned with their religious liberty, particularly in preserving their rights of individual conscience and public morality.  With respect to the vital need for virtue in order to establish and maintain a republic, the Founders were in complete harmony:


George Washington said: “Virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government,” and “Human rights can only be assured among a virtuous people.”


Benjamin Franklin said: “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.” 


James Madison stated: “To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical [imaginary] idea.”


For brevity's sake, I only provided three quotes from Gowdy's list, but you can go to the link below to read the full article and see all thirteen names and quotes, which is an impressive and compelling list. His Compilation successfully defends his argument and the crux of my position which is that freedom is not reducible to some flimsy, shallow, political talking point driven by electoral popularity or political posturing. This is the case with the Harris-Walz freedom fallacy and is why Gowdy's argument from history is still applicable and highly relevant to today's body politic. Theirs is a flagrant hijacking and misuse of freedom by liberal ideologues and a shameful ignoring of the historical foundation and all-important intersect between the indispensable ideals of faith and virtue as necessary conditions for the proper use of freedom so that our democratic republic endures "forever". From her official campaign ad to her campaign speeches, Harris fails to capture any of this and thus poses a serious risk to effectively promoting freedom in America in the spirit and intent of the founders. We can only hope that well-informed and well-intended citizens challenge her conceptualization as a corrective to Kamala's Freedom Fallacy for the common good and the preservation of American exceptionalism so as to honor freedom's heritage and Christian foundation without compromise.






________________________________

2. Minister to Freedom, Loconte, J. Ph.D., 2001

 
 
 

© 2018 by IOUintegrity. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page